AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Plaintiff filed a suit against WW Healthcare, LLC, doing business as Princeton Place, which was later barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
• Defendant-Appellee: Supported the proposed summary disposition affirming the judgment of the district court that the Plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute of limitations (para 1).

Legal Issues

• Whether the Plaintiff's claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court, holding the Plaintiff's claims barred by the statute of limitations (para 1).

Reasons

• ATTREP, Judge (with KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge and MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge concurring): The Court decided to affirm the district court's summary judgment against the Plaintiff, primarily because the Plaintiff did not file a memorandum opposing the summary affirmance within the given timeframe, and the Defendant supported the proposed summary disposition. This led to the conclusion that the Plaintiff's claims were indeed barred by the applicable statute of limitations (paras 1-2).