AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves an appeal by the Petitioner against an order of protection and a modification of a child custody arrangement.

Procedural History

• District Court of Doña Ana County, Mary W. Rosner, District Judge: Issued an order of protection and modified a child custody arrangement.

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner-Appellant: Appealed the district court's decision regarding the order of protection and the modification of the child custody arrangement. (N/A)
• Respondent-Appellee: Filed a timely memorandum in support of the district court's decision. No specific arguments are detailed in the decision. (para 1)

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's order of protection and the modification of the child custody arrangement should be upheld.

Disposition

• The appeal is affirmed. (para 2)

Reasons

• Per HANISEE, Chief Judge (BOGARDUS, Judge and IVES, Judge concurring): The decision to affirm the district court's order of protection and modification of the child custody arrangement was based on reasons previously stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. The Respondent filed a timely memorandum in support of the district court's decision, and no memorandum in opposition was submitted by the filing deadline. (paras 1-2)