AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Hone v. State (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 05/20/2015
Docket Numbers 34,248
Relations See full-text opinion - Hone v. State - 05/20/2015 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Taos County, Sarah C. Backus, District Judge

Parties' Submissions

  • Petitioner-Appellant: Linda Hone represented herself in the appeal. (N/A)
  • Respondent-Appellee: The State of New Mexico was represented by Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General.

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Taos County for the reasons stated in their calendar notice. (para 2)

Reasons

  • Per James J. Wechsler (Timothy L. Garcia, Judge, and J. Miles Hanisee, Judge concurring): The court decided to affirm the lower court's decision due to the absence of a memorandum opposing summary affirmance and since the time for filing such a memorandum had expired. (paras 1-3)
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.