AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The specific events leading to the case involving the State of New Mexico as the Plaintiff-Appellee and Patricia Gundersen as the Defendant-Appellant are not detailed in the provided text. Therefore, the factual background that initiated the legal proceedings remains unspecified.

Procedural History

  • [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellee: The State of New Mexico, represented by the Attorney General, was the party opposing the appeal. However, specific arguments made by the Appellee are not provided in the text.
  • Appellant: Patricia Gundersen, representing herself pro se, appealed the decision from the District Court of Chaves County. The nature of her arguments or the grounds for her appeal are not detailed in the text.

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Chaves County.

Reasons

  • Per Michael E. Vigil, Judge (with Celia Foy Castillo, Chief Judge, and Michael D. Bustamante, Judge concurring): The decision to affirm the lower court's ruling was based on the proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary affirmance was filed by the appellant, and the time for doing so had expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.