AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The specific events leading to the case between Irene Franco and William Feingold, et al., are not detailed in the provided text. Therefore, the factual background that initiated the legal dispute remains unspecified.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Nan G. Nash, District Judge, January 24, 2012: The details of the lower court's decision prior to this appeal are not provided in the text.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellant: The arguments and evidence presented by Irene Franco, the pro se appellant, are not specified in the provided text.
  • Defendant-Appellee (William Feingold): The arguments and evidence presented by William Feingold, represented by Simone, Roberts & Weiss PA, are not specified in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • The specific legal issues considered by the Court of Appeals of New Mexico in this case are not detailed in the provided text.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Bernalillo County.

Reasons

  • Per Michael D. Bustamante, J. (Jonathan B. Sutin, J., and Linda M. Vanzi, J., concurring): The court proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.