AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • Anthony Baca was convicted of aggravated assault. The specific events leading to this conviction are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Curry County, Fred T. Van Soelen, District Judge: Conviction of aggravated assault and designation of the conviction as a serious violent offense.

Parties' Submissions

  • Defendant-Appellant: Argued against the summary affirmance of his conviction and supported the proposed reversal of the part of his conviction designated as a serious violent offense. Relied upon the facts and arguments contained in his initial memorandum in opposition to proposed summary affirmance (N/A).
  • Plaintiff-Appellee: Informed the Court that it would not be filing a memorandum in opposition to the proposed disposition.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the conviction of aggravated assault against Anthony Baca should be affirmed.
  • Whether the district court’s designation of the conviction as a serious violent offense should be reversed.

Disposition

  • Affirmed the conviction of aggravated assault.
  • Reversed the district court’s designation of the conviction as a serious violent offense.

Reasons

  • Per J. MILES HANISEE, with JULIE J. VARGAS and DANIEL J. GALLEGOS concurring, the Court decided to affirm the Defendant's conviction of aggravated assault based on the reasons stated in their notice of proposed disposition and the second notice of proposed disposition. The Court also reversed the district court’s designation of the conviction as a serious violent offense, aligning with the Defendant's support for this part of the proposed reversal. The State's decision not to oppose the proposed disposition contributed to the Court's final decision.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.