AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the Plaintiff, Mary Torrez, seeking injunctive relief and the creation of a prescriptive easement against the Defendant, David Sanchez. The specific events leading to this legal action are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Rio Arriba County, Matthew J. Wilson, District Judge: Final order granting Plaintiff injunctive relief and creating a prescriptive easement.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellee: Filed a memorandum in support of the court's proposed summary disposition.
• Defendant-Appellant: Did not file a memorandum in opposition to the court's proposed summary disposition, and the time for doing so has expired.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's final order granting Plaintiff injunctive relief and creating a prescriptive easement should be affirmed.

Disposition

• The district court's final order granting Plaintiff injunctive relief and creating a prescriptive easement is affirmed.

Reasons

• Per VARGAS, J., with BRIANA H. ZAMORA, J., and ZACHARY A. IVES, J., concurring:
  The Court of Appeals decided to affirm the district court's final order based on the reasoning contained in its notice of proposed disposition. The decision was made after reviewing the Defendant's arguments in his docketing statement and considering the Plaintiff's memorandum in support of the proposed summary disposition. The Defendant's failure to file a memorandum in opposition to the proposed disposition, within the allotted time, also influenced the Court's decision (paras 1-2).