AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

State v. Follingstad (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 12/28/2016
Docket Numbers 35,448
Relations See full-text opinion - State v. Follingstad - 12/28/2016 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Brett R. Loveless, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellee (State of New Mexico): [Not applicable or not found]
  • Appellant (Deborah Follingstad): Represented herself pro se.

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Bernalillo County (para 3).

Reasons

  • Per James J. Wechsler, with Michael E. Vigil, Chief Judge, and Linda M. Vanzi, Judge concurring:
    The Court decided to affirm the lower court's decision for the reasons stated in their calendar notice. The appellant did not file a memorandum opposing the proposed summary affirmance, and the time to do so expired (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.