AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant, acting as a self-represented litigant, was convicted of harassment and use of telephone to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy, or offend (para 1).

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Appellee (State of New Mexico): Initially pursued convictions against the Defendant for harassment and use of telephone to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy, or offend. However, the State later filed a notice with the Court indicating it does not oppose the Court's proposed summary disposition to reverse the Defendant's convictions (para 1).
• Appellant (Shanon Crumbley): Appealed her convictions, arguing that her constitutional right to counsel was violated during the proceedings below (para 1).

Legal Issues

• Whether the Defendant's constitutional right to counsel was violated in the proceedings below.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals of the State of New Mexico reversed the Defendant's convictions and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Court's second notice of proposed disposition (para 1).

Reasons

• Per HANISEE, Chief Judge (with BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge, and SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge, concurring): The Court proposed to summarily reverse the Defendant's convictions based on the apparent violation of her constitutional right to counsel. After the State filed a notice indicating it does not oppose this proposed summary disposition, the Court decided to reverse the Defendant's convictions and remand for further proceedings, aligning with the reasons stated in the Court's second notice of proposed disposition (paras 1-2).