AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant, Jonas Terwilliger, was convicted after a jury trial in metropolitan court for aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI) (para 1).

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Briana H. Zamora, Judge: Affirmed the conviction of the Defendant for aggravated DWI.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant (Defendant): Argued against the conviction based on the same arguments made in his docketing statement and in the statement of the issues filed with the district court in his on-record appeal (para 2).
• Appellee (State): [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's affirmance of the Defendant's conviction for aggravated DWI should be upheld (para 1).

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the Defendant’s conviction for aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DWI) (para 3).

Reasons

• Per J. Miles Hanisee, with M. Monica Zamora and Henry M. Bohnhoff, Judges, concurring: The Court considered the Defendant's memorandum in opposition but remained unpersuaded, deciding to affirm the Defendant's conviction. The decision was based on the lack of new arguments or issues raised by the Defendant apart from those already considered in the district court's memorandum opinion and this Court's notice of proposed disposition. The Court referred to the thorough and well-reasoned memorandum opinion of the district court in response to the Defendant's arguments, which addressed all issues raised by the Defendant (paras 1-3).