AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendants for negligent infliction of emotional distress. The specifics of the events leading to this claim are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Bernalillo County, Carl J. Butkus, District Judge: Issued an order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant: The arguments and pieces of evidence presented by the Plaintiff-Appellant are not specified in the provided text.
• Defendants-Appellees: Similarly, the arguments and pieces of evidence presented by the Defendants-Appellees are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the District Court of Bernalillo County erred in granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's order granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Reasons

• Per LINDA M. VANZI, Judge (CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, and TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge concurring): The Court of Appeals decided to affirm the District Court's decision for reasons provided in their notice of proposed summary disposition. The Plaintiff did not file a memorandum in opposition to the proposed summary disposition, and the time to do so had passed. According to precedent, failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the proposed disposition.