AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the City of Rio Rancho as the Plaintiff-Appellee and Sean Hogan as the Defendant-Appellant. Specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Sandoval County, John F. Davis, District Judge, August 5, 2013: The details of the lower court's decision prior to this appeal are not provided.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellee: The specific arguments made by the City of Rio Rancho are not detailed in the provided text (N/A).
• Appellant: The specific arguments made by Sean Hogan are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition.

Disposition

• The appeal was dismissed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice (para 2).

Reasons

• Per JAMES J. WECHSLER, JUDGE (JONATHAN B. SUTIN, JUDGE and J. MILES HANISEE, JUDGE concurring):
  The Court of Appeals decided to dismiss the appeal. The decision was based on the lack of opposition to the proposed summary dismissal by the Defendant-Appellant, Sean Hogan, as no memorandum opposing the summary dismissal was filed within the given timeframe (paras 1-2).