AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Worker filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits, which was denied.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Administration, Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge: Denial of Worker's claim for workers' compensation benefits. (headnotes)

Parties' Submissions

• Worker-Appellant: The Worker appealed the denial of his claim for workers' compensation benefits. (para 1)
• Employer-Appellee: The Employer filed a memorandum in support of the proposed affirmance of the denial of the Worker's claim for workers' compensation benefits. (para 1)

Legal Issues

• Whether the denial of the Worker's claim for workers' compensation benefits should be affirmed. (para 1)

Disposition

• The decision of the Workers' Compensation Judge to deny the Worker's claim for workers' compensation benefits was affirmed. (para 2)

Reasons

• Per Michael E. Vigil, J., with James J. Wechsler, J., and Linda M. Vanzi, J., concurring:
  The Court of Appeals proposed to affirm the denial of the Worker's claim for workers' compensation benefits in a calendar notice. The Employer supported this proposed affirmance with a memorandum, while the Worker did not file any opposition within the given timeframe. Consequently, based on the reasons discussed in the calendar notice, the Court affirmed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Judge. (paras 1-2)