AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves the State of New Mexico as the plaintiff-appellee and Emerson Joe, also known as Ni’i Ne’e, as the defendant-appellant. The specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Charles W. Brown, District Judge, January 20, 2016: [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellee: The State of New Mexico, represented by Hector Balderas, Attorney General. The specific arguments made by the plaintiff-appellee are not detailed in the provided text.
  • Defendant-Appellant: Emerson Joe, representing himself pro se. The specific arguments made by the defendant-appellant are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico proposed summary dismissal for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal was filed, and the time for doing so expired. The appeal was dismissed (para 1).

Reasons

  • Per Michael E. Vigil, Chief Judge (Jonathan B. Sutin, Judge and Linda M. Vanzi, Judge concurring):
    The decision to dismiss the appeal was based on the absence of any memorandum opposing the proposed summary dismissal filed by the defendant-appellant, Emerson Joe. After the time for filing such a memorandum had expired, the court proceeded with the dismissal of the appeal (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.