AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves the Plaintiff, Frank Dombos, appealing against the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant, Robert Stewart, and the district court's refusal to grant the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment. The specific events leading to this appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Cibola County, Camille Martinez Olguin, District Judge, September 11, 2014: The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Defendant and refused to grant the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellant: Argued against the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant and its refusal to grant a motion for default judgment.
  • Defendant-Appellee: The specific arguments made by the Defendant-Appellee are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant.
  • Whether the district court erred in refusing to grant the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court's judgment regarding the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant and the refusal to grant the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (para 1).

Reasons

  • Per Cynthia A. Fry, J., with Timothy L. Garcia, J., and Linda M. Vanzi, J., concurring: The Court of Appeals decided to affirm in part and reverse in part the district court's judgment based on the reasons stated in a notice of proposed disposition. Neither party filed a memorandum opposing the proposed disposition, leading to the Court's decision to affirm in part and reverse in part without providing specific reasons in the memorandum opinion (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.