AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Enaje v. Vigil (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 01/23/2023
Docket Numbers A-1-CA-40555
Relations See full-text opinion - Enaje v. Vigil - 01/23/2023 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • District Court of Sandoval County, James A. Noel, District Court Judge: [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The decision of the District Court of Sandoval County was reversed (para 1).

Reasons

  • Per J. Miles Hanisee, with Kristina Bogardus and Shammara H. Henderson, JJ., concurring:
    The Court of Appeals proposed summary reversal for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary reversal was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the reversal of the lower court's decision (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.