AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The Defendant was convicted for DWI (Driving While Intoxicated). The case involves an appeal specifically concerning the ignition interlock feature of her sentence.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Curry County, Donna J. Mowrer, District Judge, January 2, 2014: Conviction for DWI and sentence including an ignition interlock feature.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellant (Defendant): Argued against the ignition interlock feature of her sentence.
  • Appellee (State): Did not oppose the Defendant's appeal concerning the ignition interlock feature of her sentence.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the ignition interlock feature of the Defendant's sentence was appropriately considered and applied.

Disposition

  • The conviction for DWI is reversed and remanded for further proceedings regarding the ignition interlock feature of the Defendant's sentence.

Reasons

  • GARCIA, Judge (with RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge, and M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge concurring):
    The Court decided to reverse and remand the case for further consideration of the Defendant's arguments against the ignition interlock feature of her sentence. This decision was influenced by the State's response, indicating no opposition to the proposed summary disposition concerning the ignition interlock feature. The Court's reasoning aligns with the arguments presented in the second notice of proposed summary disposition issued on November 14, 2013.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.