AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant, Manuel Valdez, was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The specific events leading to this conviction are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Doña Ana County, Fernando R. Macias, District Judge: Conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant (Defendant): Argued that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon (para 2).
• Appellee (State): The specific arguments made by the State are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support the Defendant's conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

Reasons

• Per LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge (TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, and J. MILES HANISEE, Judge concurring): The Court remained unpersuaded by the Defendant's argument that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction. The decision to affirm was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, which were not detailed in the provided text (paras 1-2).