AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Medina v. LC12, Inc. (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 07/22/2014
Docket Numbers 33,353
Relations See full-text opinion - Medina v. LC12, Inc. - 07/22/2014 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Taos County, John M. Paternoster, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

  • (N/A)

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Taos County (para 2).

Reasons

  • Per J. Miles Hanisee, with Michael E. Vigil and M. Monica Zamora, JJ., concurring:
    The Court proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No opposition to the summary affirmance was filed within the allowed time frame, leading to the decision to affirm the lower court's ruling (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.