AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The Defendant was convicted of intentional child abuse, not resulting in death or great bodily harm. The specifics of the events leading to the conviction are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY, Fred T. Van Soelen, District Judge: The Defendant was convicted of intentional child abuse, not resulting in death or great bodily harm.

Parties' Submissions

  • Defendant-Appellant: Argued that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the jury's conviction for intentional child abuse.
  • Plaintiff-Appellee: Filed a notice of intent not to file a memorandum in opposition to the Defendant's appeal.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support the Defendant's conviction for intentional child abuse, not resulting in death or great bodily harm.

Disposition

  • The conviction for intentional child abuse, not resulting in death or great bodily harm, was reversed.

Reasons

  • VARGAS, J., HANISEE, J., and ZAMORA, J.: The Court, after issuing a notice of proposed disposition to reverse the Defendant's conviction, decided to reverse the conviction due to the reasons stated in their calendar notice. The State's decision not to file a memorandum in opposition to the Defendant's appeal was also noted (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.