AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant was convicted for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon after attacking the victim with a dowel, resulting in injuries to the victim's arm and head that required medical attention.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Chaves County, Steven L. Bell, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant (Defendant): Challenged the sufficiency of the evidence, particularly questioning the characterization of the stick as a deadly weapon.
• Appellee (State): Argued that the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, emphasizing that the dowel, when used as a weapon, could cause death or great bodily harm.

Legal Issues

• Whether the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support the Defendant's conviction for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction.

Reasons

• The Court, led by Judge Timothy L. Garcia with Judges Jonathan B. Sutin and Michael E. Vigil concurring, held that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, was sufficient to support the conviction (para 3). The Court emphasized that it does not reweigh evidence or second-guess the jury's determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses or the interpretation of evidence (para 4). The Court also noted that the requirement for proving aggravated battery with a deadly weapon does not necessitate showing that the victim suffered deadly injuries or required overnight hospitalization, but rather that the object used in the attack was capable of causing death or great bodily harm, which was satisfied in this case (para 4).