AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves an appeal by the Respondent against the district court's decision to issue an order of protection in favor of the Petitioner. The specific events leading to the issuance of the protective order are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Bernalillo County: Issued an order of protection in favor of the Petitioner.

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
• Respondent-Appellant: Filed a memorandum in support of the appellate court's proposed summary affirmance, arguing in favor of reversing the district court's decision to issue a protective order.

Legal Issues

• Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the issuance of a protective order by the district court.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the district court's decision to issue an order of protection due to insufficient evidence.

Reasons

• Per Jennifer L. Attrep, J., with Kristina Bogardus, J., and Jane B. Yohalem, J., concurring: The appellate court decided to reverse and remand the district court's decision on the grounds of insufficient evidence to support the issuance of a protective order. This decision was made after considering the Respondent's memorandum in support of the appellate court's proposed summary affirmance and the absence of any opposition from the Petitioner (paras 1-2).