AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves the State of New Mexico as the Plaintiff-Appellant and Kirk Benton as the Defendant-Appellee. The core of the case revolves around an order granting a motion to suppress, which was appealed by the State. Specific details leading to the motion to suppress are not provided in the memorandum opinion.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Otero County, Angie K. Schneider, District Judge, May 2, 2017: The district court granted a motion to suppress in favor of the Defendant-Appellee.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellant (State of New Mexico): Intended to challenge the district court's order granting the motion to suppress but ultimately did not file a memorandum in opposition.
  • Defendant-Appellee (Kirk Benton): Successfully obtained an order from the district court to suppress, the specifics of which are not detailed in the memorandum opinion.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the district court's order granting the motion to suppress should be upheld.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order granting the motion to suppress.

Reasons

  • TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge (J. MILES HANISEE, Judge and JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge concurring):
    The Court of Appeals decided to affirm the district court's decision to grant the motion to suppress after issuing a calendar notice proposing to affirm. The State's decision not to file a memorandum in opposition to the calendar notice was a pivotal factor in the Court's affirmation of the district court's order (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.