AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• Defendants, Jerome T. Roybal and Amy J. Roybal, were involved in a foreclosure proceeding concerning their property. The district court issued an order confirming the sale of the property and the special master's report, which the Defendants sought to vacate.

Procedural History

• District Court of Santa Fe County: Order denying Defendants' motion to vacate the order confirming sale and the special master's report in the foreclosure proceeding.

Parties' Submissions

• Defendants-Appellants: Argued that the district court erred in denying their motion to vacate the order confirming sale and the special master's report, but failed to develop clear arguments or provide sufficient citations to support their assertions (para 3).
• Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court erred in denying Defendants' motion to vacate the order confirming sale and the special master's report in the foreclosure proceeding.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order denying Defendants' motion to vacate.

Reasons

• Per Gerald E. Baca, J. (J. Miles Hanisee, C.J., and Megan P. Duffy, J., concurring): The Court of Appeals found that the Defendants did not meet their burden to demonstrate that the district court erred. The Defendants' brief lacked well-supported and clear arguments, and it failed to provide necessary citations to authorities, the record proper, or exhibits to support their claims. The Court emphasized that it does not rely on mere assertions and arguments of counsel without record support. Consequently, the Defendants' failure to establish an error on the part of the district court warranted affirmation of the district court's decision (paras 1-5).