AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• In the matter concerning the estate of Rennald C. Schmidt, deceased, Phyllis Marie Schmidt and Bernhard Jerome Welz, as plaintiffs-appellants, contested against William Schmidt and Carrie Schmidt Gless, defendants-appellees. The specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Valencia County, James L. Sanchez, District Judge, with no further details on the lower court's decision provided. (headnotes)

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiffs-Appellants: Phyllis Marie Schmidt and Bernhard Welz represented themselves pro se, but their specific arguments are not detailed in the provided text. (headnotes)
• Defendants-Appellees: Represented by Tax Estate & Business Law, Ltd., Thomas Smidt II, with no specific arguments detailed in the provided text. (headnotes)

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's decision regarding the estate of Rennald C. Schmidt should be upheld.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the District Court of Valencia County. (para 1)

Reasons

• Per Cynthia A. Fry, J. (James J. Wechsler, J., and Jonathan B. Sutin, J., concurring): The Court proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision. (paras 1-2)