AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the City of Santa Fe, acting through its Police Department, as the petitioner-appellee, against a 2009 Red Mazda Sedan, with Pamela L. Martinez and the State Employees Credit Union as claimants-appellants. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Santa Fe County, David K. Thomson, District Judge, January 2, 2018: The lower court's decision is not specified in the provided text.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellee (City of Santa Fe ex rel. Santa Fe Police Department): The arguments and pieces of evidence presented by the appellee are not detailed in the provided text (N/A).
• Appellant (Pamela L. Martinez and State Employees Credit Union): The arguments and pieces of evidence presented by the appellants are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's decision regarding the 2009 Red Mazda Sedan, involving Pamela L. Martinez and the State Employees Credit Union as claimants-appellants, should be affirmed.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Santa Fe County (para 2).

Reasons

• Per LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge (M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, and EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge, concurring):
  The decision to affirm the district court's ruling was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision without further detail provided in the memorandum opinion (paras 1-3).