AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant was convicted for driving on a suspended or revoked license, lack of registration, and lack of insurance. He sought to appeal these convictions but failed to file his notice of appeal within the required thirty-day period following the entry of the district court's final order.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Defendant-Appellant: Argued against the proposed summary disposition of his appeal, presumably contesting the timeliness of his notice of appeal or seeking leniency under exceptional circumstances (para 1).
• Plaintiff-Appellee: The specific arguments of the Plaintiff-Appellee are not detailed in the decision.

Legal Issues

• Whether the Defendant's appeal should be dismissed due to the untimely filing of his notice of appeal.

Disposition

• The appeal was dismissed due to the untimely filing of the notice of appeal by the Defendant.

Reasons

• VARGAS, Judge (with MEDINA, Judge and ZAMORA, Judge concurring): The court found that the Defendant's notice of appeal was filed one day late, beyond the thirty-day period required after the entry of the district court's final order. The timely filing of a notice of appeal is a mandatory precondition for the exercise of jurisdiction. The court observed no exceptional circumstances that would warrant deviation from this strict enforcement of filing deadlines. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed (paras 1-4).