AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The Defendant was convicted for violating a City of Roswell municipal ordinance that prohibits obstructing a peace officer while the officer is performing his duties lawfully (para 1).

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Chaves County, James M. Hudson, District Judge, June 15, 2016: Conviction for violating a City of Roswell municipal ordinance against obstructing a peace officer.

Parties' Submissions

  • Defendant-Appellant: The document does not provide specific arguments made by the Defendant-Appellant (N/A).
  • Plaintiff-Appellee: The document does not provide specific arguments made by the Plaintiff-Appellee.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the Defendant's conviction for violating a City of Roswell municipal ordinance against obstructing a peace officer should be upheld (para 1).

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the Defendant's conviction (para 2).

Reasons

  • Per J. MILES HANISEE, with RODERICK T. KENNEDY and M. MONICA ZAMORA, JJ., concurring: The Court decided to affirm the Defendant's conviction after issuing a notice of proposed disposition, to which the Defendant responded by indicating a decision not to challenge the Court’s proposed affirmance. The reasons for affirming the conviction were stated in the notice of proposed disposition (paras 1-2).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.