AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves a Worker-Appellant and Employer/Insurer-Appellees in a dispute under the Workers' Compensation Administration. Specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Administration, Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge.

Parties' Submissions

• Worker-Appellant: The specific arguments made by the Worker-Appellant are not detailed in the provided text (N/A).
• Employer/Insurer-Appellees: The specific arguments made by the Employer/Insurer-Appellees are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• The specific legal issues decided in the decision are not detailed in the provided text.

Disposition

• For the reasons set forth in the second notice of proposed summary disposition filed August 11, 2014, the court AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED to the workers’ compensation administration for further proceedings (para 2).

Reasons

• Per Jonathan B. Sutin, J. (James J. Wechsler, J., and Cynthia A. Fry, J., concurring): The decision to affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand was based on the reasons stated in the second notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing that notice was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the proposed summary disposition being adopted by the court (paras 1-2).