AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves a dispute between Alan Carlson, the Plaintiff-Appellee, and Kirsten Carlson, the Defendant-Appellant. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Deborah D. Walker, District Judge, February 16, 2011.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellee: The specific arguments made by Alan Carlson are not detailed in the provided text. (N/A)
  • Appellant: Kirsten Carlson, representing herself pro se, did not file a memorandum opposing summary affirmance within the allotted time.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the district court's decision should be affirmed due to the absence of a memorandum opposing summary affirmance from the appellant.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Bernalillo County.

Reasons

  • Per Roderick T. Kennedy, J. (Michael D. Bustamante, J., and Timothy L. Garcia, J., concurring): The decision to affirm the district court's ruling was based on the appellant's failure to file a memorandum opposing summary affirmance within the designated timeframe.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.