AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the State's attempt to appeal a district court order that granted the Defendant's motion to compel the production of a forensic copy. The specifics of the underlying motion and the reasons for the district court's decision to grant it are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Bernalillo County, Charles W. Brown, District Judge: Order granting Defendant’s motion to compel production of forensic copy.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant (State): Sought to appeal the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to compel production of a forensic copy.
• Defendant-Appellee (Adam Bustamante): Filed a response to the State's notice of proposed dismissal, requesting the issuance of an opinion to ensure a full and complete record in the case.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to compel production of a forensic copy constitutes a final, appealable order.

Disposition

• The appeal by the State was dismissed.

Reasons

• The panel, consisting of Judges Linda M. Vanzi, Michael E. Vigil, and Stephen G. French, concurred in the decision to dismiss the State's appeal. The dismissal was based on the lack of a final, appealable order as indicated in the court's notice of proposed disposition. The State filed a motion to dismiss, indicating its intent not to pursue the appeal and not opposing the court's proposed disposition. The Defendant requested the issuance of an opinion to ensure a full and complete record in the case (paras 1-2).