AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Wells Fargo Bank v. Kline (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 07/30/2021
Docket Numbers A-1-CA-38058
Relations See full-text opinion - Wells Fargo Bank v. Kline - 07/30/2021 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Santa Fe County: Summary affirmance proposed, no opposing memorandum filed, and the time for doing so expired.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellee (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.): [Not applicable or not found]
  • Appellee (Breckenridge Properties Fund 2016, LLC): [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendant-Appellant (Karen M. Kline): [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendants (Pueblo de Rodeo Road Owners Association, Inc. and Manhattan Condominium Association): [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The appeal was affirmed (para 1).

Reasons

  • BOGARDUS, Judge (with MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge and BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge concurring): The decision to affirm the appeal was based on the proposed summary affirmance for the reason stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.