AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Vinyard v. Palo Alto, Inc. (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 10/21/2013
Docket Numbers 32,832
Relations See full-text opinion - Vinyard v. Palo Alto, Inc. - 10/21/2013 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Administration, Reginald C. Woodard, Workers’ Compensation Judge: [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Worker-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Employer/Insurer-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico reversed the decision of the New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Administration (para 2).

Reasons

  • Per Timothy L. Garcia, J. (Cynthia A. Fry, J., and Linda M. Vanzi, J., concurring):
    The Court of Appeals proposed summary reversal based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No opposition to the summary reversal was filed within the allotted time frame, leading to the decision to reverse the Workers’ Compensation Administration's ruling (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.