AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The plaintiffs, Karl E. Mehner and Frances J. Mehner, husband and wife, initiated a legal action against Gerald Hassell, in his individual and official capacity as President, Bank of New York, and various other defendants including unknown claimants and corporate entities, concerning a property located in Sandia Park, Bernalillo County, New Mexico. The nature of the complaint involved allegations of fraud and disputes over legal or equitable titles, liens, or interests adverse to the Mehners' title to the property.

Procedural History

  • [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiffs-Appellants: The Mehners, representing themselves, appealed the decision from the District Court of Bernalillo County. Specific arguments they presented are not detailed in the provided text.
  • Defendants-Appellees: Represented by Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A., with William R. Keleher and Allison L. Biles as counsel. Specific arguments they presented are not detailed in the provided text.
  • Defendants: Joseph L. Werntz represented Robert K. Goulding and Barbara M. Goulding, with no specific arguments detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico proposed a summary dismissal for reasons stated in a calendar notice. No memorandum opposing the summary dismissal was filed within the allowed time, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Reasons

  • The panel, consisting of Judges Cynthia A. Fry, Roderick T. Kennedy, and Jonathan B. Sutin, unanimously agreed to dismiss the appeal. The decision was based on the absence of any memorandum opposing the proposed summary dismissal by the appellants within the designated timeframe, as indicated in the calendar notice.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.