AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Stone v. Smith (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 04/27/2015
Docket Numbers 32,814
Relations See full-text opinion - Stone v. Smith - 04/27/2015 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Quay County, Albert J. Mitchell, Jr., District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellant: The specific arguments made by the Plaintiff-Appellant are not detailed in the provided text. (N/A)
  • Defendants-Appellees: The specific arguments made by the Defendants-Appellees are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Quay County. (para 2)

Reasons

  • Per Michael D. Bustamante, J., with Michael E. Vigil, Chief Judge, and M. Monica Zamora, Judge concurring:
    The Court proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in the third notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision. (paras 1-3)
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.