AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Plaintiff-Appellant, Gladys Corliss, engaged in civil proceedings against the Defendant-Appellee, Larry Bond. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant: The Plaintiff's submissions are not explicitly detailed but involve an appeal from the district court's resolution of the civil proceedings, including objections to the scope of an order prohibiting her from filing unsupervised pleadings.
• Defendant-Appellee: The Defendant's submissions are not explicitly detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's order prohibiting the Plaintiff from future unsupervised filings in the district courts of this State was too broad.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals reversed the district court's decision regarding the scope of the order prohibiting the Plaintiff from future unsupervised filings and remanded for appropriate modification. In all other respects, the district court's decision was affirmed.

Reasons

• Per Cynthia A. Fry, J. (Michael D. Bustamante, J., and Jonathan B. Sutin, J., concurring): The Court issued a notice of proposed summary disposition, suggesting affirmance in most respects but proposing reversal as to the scope of the order against the Plaintiff's unsupervised filings. Despite the Plaintiff's memorandum in opposition, the Court found no new persuasive authority or argument to alter its initial assessment. The only new matter raised by the Plaintiff involved unsupported attacks on the integrity of the judges involved in the case, which the Court rejected. The decision to reverse and remand for modification of the unsupervised filing prohibition was based on precedent from State v. Ngo, emphasizing the need for a more narrowly tailored approach.