AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The Defendant, Juan Delgado, was convicted of burglary, attempt to commit burglary, possession of burglary tools, and criminal damage to property under $1,000. The appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting these convictions.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Dona Ana County, Marci Beyer, District Judge, February 21, 2017: Affirmed the convictions for burglary, attempt to commit burglary, possession of burglary tools, and criminal damage to property.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellee (State of New Mexico): Argued that there was sufficient evidence to support the Defendant's convictions.
  • Appellant (Juan Delgado): Contended that the evidence presented was insufficient to support his convictions.

Legal Issues

  • Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Defendant's convictions for burglary, attempt to commit burglary, possession of burglary tools, and criminal damage to property.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the Defendant's convictions for all charges.

Reasons

  • TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge (LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge, and STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge concurring): The Court issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm the convictions based on the sufficiency of the evidence. The Defendant's memorandum in opposition did not identify any factual or legal errors in the Court's notice of proposed disposition. The Court, therefore, affirmed the convictions for burglary, attempt to commit burglary, possession of burglary tools, and criminal damage to property, relying on the detailed facts as alleged in the docketing statement and the legal standards set forth in State v. Ibarra.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.