AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • Karen L. Marquez and Michael Marquez, the plaintiffs-appellants, initiated a legal action against Ricardo Calzada, M.D., the defendant-appellee. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Rio Arriba County, Matthew Justin Wilson, District Judge, September 4, 2014.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellants: The specific arguments made by Karen L. Marquez and Michael Marquez are not detailed in the provided text (N/A).
  • Appellee: The specific arguments made by Ricardo Calzada, M.D., are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the case should be summarily reversed as proposed in the calendar notice.

Disposition

  • The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the calendar notice (para 1).

Reasons

  • Per Cynthia A. Fry, J. (Michael D. Bustamante, J., and J. Miles Hanisee, J., concurring): The decision to remand the case for further proceedings was based on the proposal for summary reversal stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary reversal was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the decision to remand (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.