AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the State of New Mexico's appeal against a district court order that granted the Defendant's motion to suppress an officer’s testimony.

Procedural History

• District Court of Sandoval County, Louis P. McDonald, District Judge: Granted Defendant's motion to suppress an officer's testimony.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant (State of New Mexico): [Not applicable or not found]
• Appellee (Defendant): Moved to suppress an officer's testimony.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to suppress an officer’s testimony should be upheld.

Disposition

• The appeal from the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to suppress an officer’s testimony is affirmed.

Reasons

• Per Hanisee, C.J., with Bogardus, J., and Zamora, J., concurring: The State filed a notice of non-opposition to the court's notice of proposed disposition, which proposed to affirm the district court's decision. Given the State's non-opposition and the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition, the court affirmed the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to suppress the officer's testimony (para 1).