AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Conagra Foods v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep't (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 01/10/2019
Docket Numbers A-1-CA-36871
Relations See full-text opinion - Conagra Foods v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep't - 01/10/2019 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Administrative Hearings Office, Brian VanDenzen, Hearing Officer: [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Protestant-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Respondent-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the Administrative Hearings Office (para 1).

Reasons

  • Per LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge (JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge, JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge concurring):
    The Court of Appeals of New Mexico decided to affirm the decision made by the Administrative Hearings Office for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No opposition to the summary affirmance was filed within the allotted time frame, leading to the affirmation of the lower office's decision (paras 1-2).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.