This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- The Defendant was arrested for driving while impaired (DWI) after nearly colliding with a deputy's vehicle. During the arrest, deputies detected an odor of alcohol, conducted field sobriety tests, and found the Defendant to be under the influence. A search incident to arrest revealed a folded dollar bill in the Defendant's pocket, which was recognized as a method for packaging cocaine. The substance within the dollar bill was later confirmed to be cocaine. The Defendant was convicted of possession of cocaine among other charges (paras 2-4).
Procedural History
- Appeal from the District Court of Doña Ana County, Stephen Bridgforth, District Judge.
- Certiorari Denied, March 23, 2012, No. 33,482. Released for Publication May 15, 2012.
Parties' Submissions
- Defendant: Argued that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the physical evidence found on his person because the search violated the United States Constitution and New Mexico Constitution. Also contended that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for possession of cocaine (para 1).
- State: Conceded that the Defendant preserved his Fourth Amendment claim but argued that the Defendant’s claim under the New Mexico Constitution should be rejected due to failure to show a compelling reason for Article II, Section 10 to afford more protection than the Fourth Amendment (para 5).
Legal Issues
- Whether the district court erred in refusing to suppress the cocaine found on the Defendant.
- Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Defendant's conviction for possession of a controlled substance.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s denial of the Defendant’s motion to suppress and affirmed his convictions (para 19).
Reasons
-
Per RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge (JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge concurring):The court found that the search incident to arrest was valid under both the United States Constitution and New Mexico Constitution. It was determined that the search, which led to the discovery of cocaine, was reasonable and fell under an exception to the warrant requirement. The court emphasized the importance of the officer's training and experience in recognizing the folded dollar bill as a method for packaging cocaine. The court also concluded that there was sufficient evidence to support the Defendant's conviction for possession of cocaine, as the substance found was confirmed to be cocaine and was in a form commonly used to conceal and ingest the drug. The court rejected the Defendant's argument that the evidence should have been excluded as "fruit of the poisonous tree" because the deputy had an independent basis for the search and seizure of the folded dollar bill (paras 5-18).
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.