AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant-Appellant, Jay Charley, was convicted of aggravated DWI. The specifics leading to this conviction are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Briana H. Zamora, District Judge, March 29, 2016: Conviction for aggravated DWI upheld.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant: Challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction and possibly renews challenge to the denial of his motion to suppress. No new arguments or authority presented (para 2).
• Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the Defendant's conviction for aggravated DWI.
• Whether the denial of the Defendant's motion to suppress was proper.

Disposition

• The conviction for aggravated DWI is affirmed (para 3).

Reasons

• Per J. MILES HANISEE, with concurrence from MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge, and RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge: The court granted the Defendant's motion to accept as timely but remained unpersuaded by the Defendant's challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence and possibly the denial of his motion to suppress due to no new arguments or authority being presented. Consequently, the court affirmed the conviction based on the reasons described in the notice of proposed summary disposition (paras 1-3).