AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves an appeal by Defendants-Appellants Simone M. Robinson-Vann and Curtis Vann against an order from the district court that denied their motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. (para 1)

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Valerie Huling, District Judge, March 7, 2016: Denied motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellants: Argued that the district court lacked jurisdiction. (N/A)
• Appellee: Supported the district court's decision to deny the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. (para 1)

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court had jurisdiction to deny the motion to dismiss filed by the appellants.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order denying the appellants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. (para 2)

Reasons

• Per J. Miles Hanisee, with Roderick T. Kennedy and Timothy L. Garcia, Judges, concurring: The decision to affirm the district court's denial of the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. The appellants did not file a memorandum opposing summary affirmance, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the district court's decision. (paras 1-3)