AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant, Angelo Cly, was convicted by the metropolitan court for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and speeding (para 1).

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Judith K. Nakamura, District Judge: Affirmed the metropolitan court's convictions for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and speeding.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant (Defendant): Argued against the convictions for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and speeding, as presented in the docketing statement and the statement of issues filed with the district court in his on-record appeal (paras 1-2).
• Appellee (State): Supported the affirmance of the Defendant's convictions, as indicated by the proposed disposition to affirm the convictions and adopt the district court's memorandum opinion (para 1).

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court erred in affirming the metropolitan court's convictions of the Defendant for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and speeding.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the Defendant's convictions for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and speeding (para 3).

Reasons

• Per Roderick T. Kennedy, J. (M. Monica Zamora, J., and J. Miles Hanisee, J., concurring): The Court considered the Defendant's memorandum in opposition but found no new arguments apart from those previously made in his docketing statement and the statement of issues filed with the district court. The Court proposed to adopt the district court's thorough and well-reasoned memorandum opinion in response to the Defendant's arguments. The Defendant failed to raise any new arguments or issues that would convince the Court to reconsider its proposed adoption of the district court's memorandum opinion. Consequently, for the reasons set forth in the Court's notice of proposed disposition and the district court's memorandum opinion, the Defendant's convictions were affirmed (paras 1-3).