AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves an appeal by McElvain Oil & Gas Properties, Inc. (McElvain) against an order granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of co-Defendant United Drilling, Inc. (United), and a stipulated order dismissing all of Plaintiffs’ claims against United. The plaintiffs, Julie Sakura, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sergio Raul Montano-Moreno, and Gloria Moreno, had filed claims against several defendants, including McElvain and United.

Procedural History

  • District Court of Santa Fe County, Barbara Vigil, District Judge: Granted co-Defendant United Drilling, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment and issued a stipulated order dismissing all of Plaintiffs' claims against United.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellant (McElvain Oil & Gas Properties, Inc.): Sought to appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of United and the stipulated order dismissing all plaintiffs' claims against United (N/A).
  • Appellees (Julie Sakura, as Personal Representative, and Gloria Moreno): Supported the dismissal of the appeal, arguing the absence of a final, appealable order (N/A).
  • Co-Defendant/Appellee (United Drilling, Inc.): Supported the dismissal of the appeal, aligning with the reasons set forth in the notice of proposed summary disposition.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the order granting co-Defendant United Drilling, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment and the stipulated order dismissing all of Plaintiffs' claims against United constitute a final, appealable order.

Disposition

  • The appeal was dismissed for want of a final, appealable order.

Reasons

  • Per BUSTAMANTE, J. (WECHSLER, J., FRY, J. concurring): The court dismissed the appeal based on the reasons set forth in the notice of proposed summary disposition, which proposed dismissal for want of a final, appealable order. The court noted that memoranda in support of the dismissal were filed by United and Plaintiffs, and no memorandum in opposition was filed within the allowed time frame.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.