AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• Petitioner and Respondent, once married, divorced with a marital settlement agreement (MSA) that included the transfer of a tract of land to Petitioner. This land was later found to have tax liens that exceeded its value. Additionally, after modifying their child custody arrangement, a dispute arose regarding the modification of Respondent's child support obligations.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner: Argued that the district court erred by concluding she had constructive notice of tax liens on the property awarded to her in the MSA and contested the modification of child support obligations following a custody arrangement change.
• Respondent: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court erred in concluding the Petitioner had constructive notice of tax liens on the property awarded in the MSA.
• Whether the district court erred in modifying the child support obligation following the parties' modification of the custody arrangement.

Disposition

• The district court's decisions regarding the tax liens on the property and the modification of child support obligations were affirmed.

Reasons

• GARCIA, Judge, with VIGIL and VANZI, Judges concurring, held that:
  Regarding the Socorro Property: The district court did not err in its conclusion that Petitioner had constructive notice of the tax liens on the property awarded to her in the MSA. The court found substantial evidence supporting this decision, noting that the liens were recorded during the marriage and Petitioner was aware of other tax issues (paras 5-9).
  Regarding Child Support: The district court did not abuse its discretion in modifying Respondent's child support obligation. This decision was based on a substantial change in circumstances following the parties' agreement to modify the custody arrangement, which was found to justify the modification of child support in accordance with statutory guidelines (paras 10-12).