This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- The case involves the State's appeal against the district court's decision to dismiss charges against the Defendant due to a violation of the magistrate court 182-day rule.
Procedural History
- [Not applicable or not found]
Parties' Submissions
- State: Indicated that it would not be filing a memorandum in opposition to the notice of proposed summary disposition suggesting the dismissal of the appeal for lack of a final order (para 2).
- Defendant: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for lack of a final order.
Disposition
- The appeal was dismissed for lack of a final order (para 3).
Reasons
-
VIGIL, Chief Judge, with CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, and LINDA M. VANZI, Judge concurring: The court decided to dismiss the State's appeal due to the absence of a final order, as detailed in the notice of proposed summary disposition. The State's response to the notice, indicating no opposition to the proposed dismissal, further supported this decision (paras 1-3).
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.