AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves the estate of Claude Bryon Eschmann, with Carol Ann Eschmann acting as the Personal Representative of the estate. Ronald K. Alford intervened in the matter, appealing from a decision made by the District Court of Sandoval County. The specifics leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • District Court of Sandoval County: Decision appealed by Ronald K. Alford.

Parties' Submissions

  • Petitioner-Appellee (Carol Ann Eschmann): [Not applicable or not found]
  • Intervenor-Appellant (Ronald K. Alford): [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The appeal by Ronald K. Alford was affirmed.

Reasons

  • Per Hanisee, C.J., with Bogardus and Zamora, JJ., concurring: The Court of Appeals proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.