AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves an appeal by the Appellant against the district court's decision, which granted the Appellee's petition for restitution and denied several pending motions filed by the Appellant in a de novo appeal from metropolitan court (para 1).

Procedural History

• District Court of Bernalillo County: Granted Appellee’s petition for restitution and denied a number of pending motions filed by Appellant in Appellant’s de novo appeal from metropolitan court.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant-Appellant: Demanded the Court of Appeals to review the transcript from the lower court, arguing that the transcript "stands on its own" and that the proceedings "was not a trial" (para 2).
• Appellee-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court erred in granting the Appellee's petition for restitution and denying the Appellant's pending motions (para 1).
• Whether the Appellant's motion to seal should be granted (para 1).

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling of the district court, granting the Appellee's petition for restitution and denying the Appellant's pending motions (para 3).
• The Court of Appeals denied the Appellant's motion to seal (para 3).

Reasons

• Per ATTREP, J. (DUFFY, J., and YOHALEM, J., concurring): The Court remained unpersuaded by the Appellant's memorandum in opposition, which failed to provide the necessary facts, argument, and information to address and understand his appellate arguments. The Court highlighted the Appellant's responsibility to clearly point out errors in fact or law in response to the Court's notice of proposed disposition, which the Appellant failed to fulfill. Consequently, the Court affirmed the district court's decision based on the Appellant's failure to demonstrate error and also denied the motion to seal due to lack of provided reasons (paras 1-3).