AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant was convicted of DWI (Driving While Intoxicated) and failure to maintain lane. The events leading to these convictions initiated the legal proceedings against the Defendant.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County: The Defendant was convicted of DWI and failure to maintain lane.

Parties' Submissions

• Defendant-Appellant: Argued that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress.
• Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court erred in denying the Defendant's motion to suppress.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions of DWI and failure to maintain lane.

Reasons

• The decision was delivered by Judge Linda M. Vanzi, with Judges Jennifer L. Attrep and Zachary H. Ives concurring. The Court of Appeals remained unpersuaded by the Defendant's memorandum in opposition, which argued against the denial of his motion to suppress but offered no additional argument or authority in support of his position. The appellate court noted that the district court had thoroughly and thoughtfully considered the issue and concluded that the Defendant was not prejudiced by the denial of the motion to suppress. Consequently, the Court of Appeals perceived no error in the district court's decision and affirmed the convictions (paras 1-5).